Software testing is used to evaluate the product and understand whether it really matches the declared functionality. The quality assurance process in software testing provides the product owner with information about its condition and whether all requirements are taken into account during the development process.

Software Testing Procedures

Despite the fact that the software testing process was not always perceived as an integral part of creating a product, in our time the attitude to this stage of the software life cycle has changed significantly. Maybe we don’t have to think much about software that works without failures, but if something goes wrong, we can be concerned about a significant number of possible causes of this failure.

Take the following example: the profit of companies whose products showed critical bugs fell by 4%, and then more, in 2019. It is not surprising that as a result, organizations began to spend an average of $ 300 billion a year on troubleshooting product problems, and that the profession of a QA manager has become demanded and unexpectedly profitable. While most companies claim that the organization of the software testing process comes down to the timely detection and elimination of bugs, it has its own nuances. Below we will review some best practices for the proper organization of testing, which can be applied to guarantee an improvement in the product quality assurance process. Check top 10 software testing companies that use only advanced technologies.

  1. Practice a quality defect description and work planning.

    During software testing, how would you answer the questions about where the product is moving, in which parts of it there are deviations from the requirements, and in what state are the test results? The answers come down to writing bug reports and test management. A qualitative description of existing defects and test planning are the skills that distinguish talented testers from others.

    Competent bug tracking and test management add to the overall value of the software testing process by improving the individual skills of each tester, timely overcoming difficulties that can slow down the testing process, and building interaction between development and testing teams. In addition, using this approach, test coverage, test speed and overall product quality will be improved due to prioritization and the ability to check detailed information about bugs, sudden defects, test results and much more.

  2. Describe the software testing process appropriate for your team.

    To ensure effective testing as a type of software quality assurance, it is important to establish a pre-established process. It should be debugged and approved by experts who know how business processes in the company go so that sudden difficulties do not affect the testing process. Despite the fact that unconditional adherence to the established process is not necessary, it may be useful in the early stages of testing. The process description can be enhanced by adding preconditions for performing product tests.

  3. Tune in to the eventual detection of bugs.

    For software testing services to be effective, the tester must tune in to a positive result - i.e. the presence of at least a few bugs - before starting work. This will inspire him to carefully search for defects and use the ability to correctly describe them in practice. Believe that the application has a bunch of different bugs and errors, and at the end of testing you will definitely find them all.

  4. Build an appropriate testing environment.

    To make sure that the environment in which product tests are carried out adequately reflects the one in which it enters mass use is the duty of the testing team. This is necessary to ensure that no bugs were missed due to problems in organizing the testing process.

  5. Delve into the core of issues.

    To make changes and upgrades to the product test plan, in view of the bugs found by clients, the analyzer should continually dive into their subtleties. The analyzer's notoriety relies upon this: he needs to attempt to exhibit the nearness/nonappearance of the expressed issue. There is one more motivation behind why experienced analyzers themselves frequently study ventures for bugs: by doing this, you can more readily comprehend the structure of the item, comprehend who its potential client is, the manner by which and why it will utilize the item, what issue it ought to settle and how the item, how the item should look and function, which at last will test it in more detail and with high caliber.

In this way, the association of item quality confirmation is a territory that can and ought to be created, and which continually grows the perspectives on the analyzer on the most proficient method to improve the procedure in general. In addition, persistent improvement of the testing association can expand the expert level and transform the analyzer into a genuine pioneer in this field.